Well, the Union of South Africa were participants in the war against Germany, so that’s still a bit weird. Don’t know about the affiliation of the magazine in question, but the support for joining the allies wasn’t clear cut, but only a narrow majority among the ruling white class.
Comment on And they say English is bad
lugal@sopuli.xyz 5 months agoThat explains the neutral tone. It’s something important far away.
FreeFacts@lemmy.world 5 months ago
lengau@midwest.social 5 months ago
There was a strong pro-Nazi contingent amongst (mainly) Afrikaans-speaking South Africans. That’s not to say by any stretch that Afrikaners were mostly pro-Nazi, though. Jan Smuts was an Afrikaner and was both a Field Marshal in the South African defence forces and the prime minister during WW2 - he wasn’t exactly pro-British (he fought against them in the second Boer war), but he was very strongly anti-Nazi.
LordWiggle@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Yes, just like Americans they think it’s their country and the original inhabitants have no place in their country.
Aceticon@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Also that newspaper is called “The Fatherland”.
It’s a pretty good hint of where they stand in the whole Left-Right political spectrum.
lugal@sopuli.xyz 5 months ago
Which is super weird in it self. I mean, do South African white people call their colonist nation their “Fatherland”?
Crashumbc@lemmy.world 5 months ago
FYI- South Africa is kind of unique in that it was settled by a ruling class as opposed to the normal dregs like most other places.
The maintained their close relationship to home and superior status to their slaves/servants much longer than other places.
Cryophilia@lemmy.world 5 months ago
“mother country” or “motherland” is pretty common for descendants of European colonists/emigrees. I know Germans call it “fatherland” instead, probably the Dutch too
lugal@sopuli.xyz 5 months ago
So this is a newspaper about Europe, I see
kandoh@reddthat.com 5 months ago
I think they call it the Volkstaat