Comment on Amazon hit with $5.9 million fine for violating California labor law
evergreen@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Oh no! That’s almost seven minutes worth of revenue!
Comment on Amazon hit with $5.9 million fine for violating California labor law
evergreen@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Oh no! That’s almost seven minutes worth of revenue!
Anticorp@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
That seemed a bit ridiculous, so I checked. You’re right.
NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
So that would be around $2.40 fine for someone making 50k/year
jol@discuss.tchncs.de 2 weeks ago
Literal pocket change.
NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Just think of how many laws I can break at $2.40 a pop!
Cybermonk_Taiji@r.nf 2 weeks ago
Just to flesh out the context:
Anticorp@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
That is absolutely insane. Completely bonkers. They’re making more money in one day than most businesses have made over the course of the founder’s entire life, throughout the entire history of the world.
FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 2 weeks ago
It is still insufficient, but it’s also disingenuous to use the profit of their global operations to say the fine is a small cost of doing business to their California warehouses.
Mkengine@feddit.de 2 weeks ago
Does the fine have to be paid from profits made in California? If not I don’t see why this is relevant, other than semantics.
FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 2 weeks ago
If it costs a company more to do something than not do it:
Then they won’t do it.
To make a truly genuine argument you would need to use their profit from abuse in warehouses in California, where they were fined.