Can’t even rly blame the AI at that point
Comment on AI is the future
Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 5 months ago
kate@lemmy.uhhoh.com 5 months ago
TheFriar@lemm.ee 5 months ago
Sure we can. If it gives you bad information because it can’t differentiate between a joke a good information…well, seems like the blame falls exactly at the feet of the AI.
kate@lemmy.uhhoh.com 5 months ago
Should an LLM try to distinguish satire? Half of lemmy users can’t even do that
KevonLooney@lemm.ee 5 months ago
Do you just take what people say on here as fact? That’s the problem, people are taking LLM results as fact.
BakerBagel@midwest.social 5 months ago
It should if you are gonna feed it satire to learn from
pipows@lemmy.today 5 months ago
If it’s being used to give the definite answer of a search, so it should. If it can, than it shouldn’t be used for that
xavier666@lemm.ee 5 months ago
Sarcasm detection is a very hard problem in NLP to be fair
SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 5 months ago
“If it’s on the internet it must be true” implemented in a billion dollar project.
lugal@sopuli.xyz 5 months ago
Not sure what would frighten me more: the fact that this is trainings data or if it was hallucinated
EpeeGnome@lemm.ee 5 months ago
Neither, in this case it’s an accurate summary of one of the results, which happens to be a shitpost on Quara.
xavier666@lemm.ee 5 months ago
Pretty sure AI will start telling us “You should not believe everything you see on the internet as told by Abraham Lincoln”