I think obvious that she would have sided with Maddox and disagreed with the ruling. I don’t think her capable of overcoming her prejudices against artificial life forms.
Comment on Dr. Pulaski Appreciation Post
ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 5 months ago
I’m pretty ambivalent about her, but I agree it was an interesting performance, particularly for a woman at that time in television.
She was horribly underused - it’s downright criminal that she doesn’t pay a significant role in “The Measure of a Man.”
richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one 5 months ago
Deebster@programming.dev 5 months ago
I watched that one last night and had the same thought - she’s been the face of nonacceptance towards Data and although Bruce Maddox is far more extreme in his views it seemed like a waste of her character building.
That said, they’d already shoehorned in a Guinan scene so I don’t know where they’d find the time.
milkisklim@lemm.ee 5 months ago
Could you please expand on what you mean by shoehorning in the Guinan scene? How would you handle it if you were the episode writer?
Edit: to be clear, I know what shoehorning is, I just want to know why you think it occured here.
Deebster@programming.dev 5 months ago
I was referring to this trivia:
I took it as true, although I had a quick go at finding where this claim came from and am drawing a blank
MentallyExhausted@reddthat.com 5 months ago
I think that scene was necessary. “Disposable people” was a powerful summary of the issue.
milkisklim@lemm.ee 5 months ago
Interesting and cool if true. Thanks!