Comment on near zero

• Rev3rze@feddit.nl ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Is it really that confusing? If it had said there was a pot of gold the implication is clear that the person who reaches it will be rich. You ask “why a nude woman?” and the answer is simply because, just like being rich, desiring a sexual partner is a common desire.

  source

  • XTL@sopuli.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    A pot of gold explaining the rules to you about it ringing a bell would definitely be even more suspicious than a woman.

    source

    • Rev3rze@feddit.nl ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      It’s a pot of gold. Obviously there’s a leprechaun involved who will be presenting the riddle.

      source

      • XTL@sopuli.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        Makes sense. But that would not make me less suspicious.

        source
    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      i would definitely be more suspicious of it. This is probably another paradox frankly.

      source
  • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    i think it would make equally as much sense, if not more, if the word naked was just removed.

    It’s just fucking shoehorned into it.

    source
• Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  I thought it implied an erection.

  source

  • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    that could be it.

    source