Comment on near zero
RoosterBoy@lemm.ee 5 months agoExactly, it’s the same joke regardless so why get bent out of shape over it?
Comment on near zero
RoosterBoy@lemm.ee 5 months agoExactly, it’s the same joke regardless so why get bent out of shape over it?
KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 months ago
i mean yeah, i guess so, but that’s not what im confused over.
I just want to know why specifically it was written with a nude woman? It never alluded to anything in particular.
Rev3rze@feddit.nl 5 months ago
Is it really that confusing? If it had said there was a pot of gold the implication is clear that the person who reaches it will be rich. You ask “why a nude woman?” and the answer is simply because, just like being rich, desiring a sexual partner is a common desire.
XTL@sopuli.xyz 5 months ago
A pot of gold explaining the rules to you about it ringing a bell would definitely be even more suspicious than a woman.
Rev3rze@feddit.nl 5 months ago
It’s a pot of gold. Obviously there’s a leprechaun involved who will be presenting the riddle.
KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 months ago
i would definitely be more suspicious of it. This is probably another paradox frankly.
KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 months ago
i think it would make equally as much sense, if not more, if the word naked was just removed.
It’s just fucking shoehorned into it.
Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 5 months ago
I thought it implied an erection.
KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 months ago
that could be it.