Comment on near zero

• KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  i mean yeah, i guess so, but that’s not what im confused over.

  I just want to know why specifically it was written with a nude woman? It never alluded to anything in particular.

  source

  • Rev3rze@feddit.nl ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Is it really that confusing? If it had said there was a pot of gold the implication is clear that the person who reaches it will be rich. You ask “why a nude woman?” and the answer is simply because, just like being rich, desiring a sexual partner is a common desire.

    source

    • XTL@sopuli.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      A pot of gold explaining the rules to you about it ringing a bell would definitely be even more suspicious than a woman.

      source

      • Rev3rze@feddit.nl ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        It’s a pot of gold. Obviously there’s a leprechaun involved who will be presenting the riddle.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        i would definitely be more suspicious of it. This is probably another paradox frankly.

        source
    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      i think it would make equally as much sense, if not more, if the word naked was just removed.

      It’s just fucking shoehorned into it.

      source
  • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    I thought it implied an erection.

    source

    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      that could be it.

      source