While I disagree with it, there is a valid argument that getting rid of the filibuster would become an absolute disaster once Republicans gain the majority.
Though if I recall correctly, filibuster rule can be removed with 51% majority but obviously Democrats are too nice to remove that.
ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 5 months ago
K1nsey6@lemmy.world 5 months ago
It’s an easy rotating villain they can pull out at their convenience
notnotmike@programming.dev 5 months ago
Less nice, more realizing that would remove their ability to stop the Republicans when the political winds inevitability shift the other way
TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Oh did Democrats stop the Republicans when the winds shifted?
Oh no they didn’t. They went along with them.
bostonbananarama@lemmy.world 5 months ago
What the hell are you talking about? Your comment is entirely divorced from reality. There were 175 cloture votes to break a filibuster on nominees during the Obama administration and 314 during Trump. Nearly doubled in half the time.
Cryophilia@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Crickets from the peanut gallery🤣
SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 5 months ago
Right, which is why I’ve been saying that the Democrats should restore the filibuster. What they have now is not a filibuster, in practice, it’s more akin to an administrative hold. One Senator indicates an intent to filibuster via email, and they move on to other business.
Make 'em do it. Pick a popular issue, and lean into it. Make the Republicans actually stand up there at the podium and talk for hours. Get them on camera on the news every night as obstructionists, blocking the will of the people. Yes, it will waste Senate session time; that’s a perfect opportunity for all of the Democrats to roast them non-stop to reporters. It’ll be painful for a while, but at least has a chance of breaking the log jam. (And if the GQP doesn’t take the bait, hey, popular thing gets passed!)
xmunk@sh.itjust.works 5 months ago
Filibustering is dumb and it shouldn’t exist - if we want the ability for a narrow minority to block law making we should just increase the threshold to pass laws - we shouldn’t allow a weird procedural rule to block discussion of a law whether through talking a long time or just doing so by email.
daltotron@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Couldn’t the republicans just do the same thing and remove it when they get a 51% majority
notnotmike@programming.dev 5 months ago
I would imagine its a case of mutually assured destruction. Neither wants to repeal it because they know once they do, they open up Pandora’s box and Congress will be even more of a disaster than it currently is