Yeah. Seems like a waste of effort to me. If they’re scraping movies and books illegally then you aren’t gonna stop em with a link at the bottom of a comment.
adding license to comments is nice touch but i don’t think scrapper is gonna care
Twinklebreeze@lemmy.world 5 months ago
CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Best not to derail this topic. It’s been discussed to death already.
CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 5 months ago
adding license to comments is nice touch but i don’t think scrapper is gonna care
Best not to derail this topic. It’s been discussed to death already.
cm0002@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Yea, but propublica has money to hire lawyers and can actually take companies to court over it.
Are you prepared to shell out potentially 10’s of thousands of dollars to actually defend your license? That’s my biggest question in this, because if not it really is a waste of time and effort.
CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Are you prepared to shell out potentially 10’s of thousands of dollars to actually defend your license? That’s my biggest question in this, because if not it really is a waste of time and effort.
Well I meant for you to also go to the top of that conversation to read everything that’s been discussed, including my answer to the question you just asked.
Also, we’re really derailing the topic of the post.
cm0002@lemmy.world 5 months ago
I did, but you never really answer the question, are you financially prepared and willing to actually defend your license?
And also your link has become incredibly obnoxious, you don’t need all those “~”
conditional_soup@lemm.ee 5 months ago
Still going to poison the results and be embarrassing when the LLM starts putting creative commons licensing in its output.
catalog3115@lemmy.world 5 months ago
😂 but I think 🤔 they have some cleaning process, I don’t know exactly what is called but they remove all anomalies like this 😔. 👍 If this works