Comment on Why Didn't Democrats Do More When They Controlled Both Houses of Legislature, The White House, and The Supreme Court During Obama's First Term?

CosmicCleric@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

• catalog3115@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  adding license to comments is nice touch but i don’t think scrapper is gonna care

  source

  • conditional_soup@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Still going to poison the results and be embarrassing when the LLM starts putting creative commons licensing in its output.

    source

    • catalog3115@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      😂 but I think 🤔 they have some cleaning process, I don’t know exactly what is called but they remove all anomalies like this 😔. 👍 If this works

      source
  • Twinklebreeze@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Yeah. Seems like a waste of effort to me. If they’re scraping movies and books illegally then you aren’t gonna stop em with a link at the bottom of a comment.

    source

    • CosmicCleric@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Best not to derail this topic. It’s been discussed to death already.

      ~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~

      source
  • CosmicCleric@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    adding license to comments is nice touch but i don’t think scrapper is gonna care

    Best not to derail this topic. It’s been discussed to death already.

    ~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~

    source

    • cm0002@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Yea, but propublica has money to hire lawyers and can actually take companies to court over it.

      Are you prepared to shell out potentially 10’s of thousands of dollars to actually defend your license? That’s my biggest question in this, because if not it really is a waste of time and effort.

      source

      • CosmicCleric@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        Are you prepared to shell out potentially 10’s of thousands of dollars to actually defend your license? That’s my biggest question in this, because if not it really is a waste of time and effort.

        Well I meant for you to also go to the top of that conversation to read everything that’s been discussed, including my answer to the question you just asked.

        Also, we’re really derailing the topic of the post.

        ~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~

        source

        • -> View More Comments
• cygon@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  I think this is really the core of it.

  I remember that it took months of discussions, compromises and buttering up specific opposition members to get it passed, and that it was a trimmed-down version of the original Medicare plans.

  I wish I could remember where, but when answering a question very similar to the OP’s - perhaps in an interview? - Obama explained that he would have very much liked to tackle two big things: health care and climate, but that his party’s resources were stretched too thin to do both at the same time and that he knew they would loose control of the house in the midtems (2011), so he picked one thing.

  Table listing who held the house and the senate during the Obama presidency from 2009 to 2017

  source
• K1nsey6@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Between the time that Obama was sworn in and the ACA getting passed Congress had passed 161 other substantial bills. The major one that was shelved being the freedom of choice act which had already been written and waiting in a vote since 2003.

  source

  • CosmicCleric@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Congress had passed 161 other substantial bills

    [citation required]

    ~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~

    source