If your response is ‘just google it’, its not a response.
Onus is on you to support your claims.
Comment on Allegedly*
Num10ck@lemmy.world 6 months agoi just googled ‘OJ simpson son’ i’m not a reporter.
If your response is ‘just google it’, its not a response.
Onus is on you to support your claims.
User Num10ck actually said they don’t believe that OJ’s son did it, they’re just articulating another prevalent theory. If this were a debate I’d agree with you, but this is actually just casual speculation about an event from 20 years ago.
Its just bad internet manners to not provide the links to the claim you want people to understand/ engage with.
Like, if we’re going to discuss something, and you have a point your are looking to make, drop a link. Its not my job to put out effort to find support or research a claim I’m not making.
It really is. Now you have all these suggestions you’re not going to qualify. Arguing is performative and it’s clear you would rather do that than take five seconds to clarify lmao
everything i put is on the first page of google results for the search term i provided.
you have everything you need to easily get to where i got.
If you make a claim, you’ve got to go out and gather, qualify, and frame the evidence.
Not our job, yours.
hah either a lazy troll or you fundamentally misunderstand the nature of our relationship, or what lemmy is.
Axiochus@lemmy.world 6 months ago
Well, what kind of sources did you find for the claims that you are actively stating as facts? I think it’s important to provide sources for claims as strong as these, regardless of whether you are a reporter or a veterinarian.