Comment on i tend to agree

• SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  The first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club

  source
• disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Despite having “sexual” as its root, sapiosexuality is an attraction-defining term, not to be confused with a definition of sexuality. Like other attraction-defining terms, it’s not exclusive.

  source

  • Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I just hate labels. I like what I like. Not just smart people. Not just pretty people. Not even people with specific genitals.

    source

    • flicker@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Ah. Chaotic horny.

      Just like me.

      source

      • imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        now kiss

        source
    • wewbull@feddit.uk ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Not just smart people. Not just pretty people.

      …but also pretty smart people?

      source
  • Zagorath@aussie.zone ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Why does this comment start with “despite”? Aren’t all [something]sexualities “attraction-defining terms”?

    source

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Traditionally speaking, the terms heterosexual and homosexual tend to be exclusive by omitting attraction to the opposite sex. I was clarifying that a sapiosexual is not exclusively attracted to intellectuals.

      *Now that sexuality is defined as a non-binary spectrum, some may disagree with my use of “opposite sex.” I admit I don’t know the correct way to convey the idea. I don’t mean to offend.

      source
• match@pawb.social ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  oh yeah, I’m also attracted to what you’re attracted to

  source