Comment

Sharpiemarker@startrek.website ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

Just a heads up, the NLRB has taken an aggressive stance against companies that refuse to allow their employees to unionize.

So when a company has a positive response to unionization, just keep in mind that they don’t really have any other option but to “grin and bear it” so to speak.

source

Sort:hotnew top

jasep@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
I don’t agree. We’ve seen many times companies close locations outright after they unionize. At times governing bodies like the NLRB will fine them, and they’ll gladly eat those fines and keep them closed.

source
- Sharpiemarker@startrek.website ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  The new framework put forth by the NLRB only went into effect in late 2023 (November/December).
  
  It requires a majority of employees to want to form a union.
  
  The NLRB intends to force Starbucks to reopen the 23 stores they closed. This news is from last month, so it’s still pretty recent.
  
  I agree that when the penalty is a fine, it’s just the cost of doing business, but it appears that the NLRB are attempting to go another route.
  
  source
  - jasep@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    I hope they’re successful. Time will tell. These greedy companies (like Walmart and Starbucks, not Costco) have a lot of money and good legal teams.
    
    source
- EmptySlime@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  If I was reading the NLRB rules change correctly that would be “union busting” activity and would mean they immediately have to recognize and begin bargaining with the union.
  
  source
Windex007@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
Ah yes, as famously evidenced by Elon Musk backtracking on his Tesla unionization opposition

source
Sunforged@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
Tell that to Amazon.

source