Comment on Anon notices what they've taken from us
KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 months ago
genuinely dont understand the logic behind having that many cameras. Surely it would just be better to have a singular better sensor, and some additional hardware for it?
uis@lemmy.world 11 months ago
iturnedintoanewt@lemm.ee 11 months ago
uis@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Good beer
Tikiporch@lemmy.world 11 months ago
I believe the extra cameras are fixed optical zoom. The physical limitations of the phones dimensions means you can’t have 1x-10x zoom, because the lens would need to move forward and backward like on a real camera lens. So you’ve got a 1x, 3x, 10x, fish-eye, etc.
scottywh@lemmy.world 11 months ago
My suspicion is that the main purpose behind the multiple rear cameras is mostly to more easily create depth mapping and improved accuracy location metadata.
BenadrylChunderHatch@lemmy.world 11 months ago
As someone with a 3+1 camera phone who likes taking photos, it’s a huge improvement over a single lens. I wouldn’t buy a single lens phone again.
KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 months ago
i mean, size constraints, sure. But camera bumps ONLY get bigger, and more unreasonable. Remember the iphone 6? little itty bitty nub. That’s not the case anymore.
apple? (Idk, i dont care tbh) recently unveiled the incredible technology known as “two mirrors” in order to abuse the dimensions of an iphone to get a longer focal length.
Even then, surely you could just put a bigger, higher resolution sensor on it, and then use digital zooming instead. That way it at least pretends to have features. Even then why bother adding more features, it’s a phone, all it’s going to do is be a nuisance at family gatherings. Because for some reason people HAVE to take pictures of everything.
wolfpack86@lemmy.world 11 months ago
I think the laws of optics starts to conflict with this
KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 months ago
maybe? I still feel like there just has to be a better solution than “hey lets just add more camera”
spader312@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Smaller sensors pick up less and less light, forcing to bump iso. Limiting low light photography or dealing with very grainy low contrast images
KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 months ago
which would be why i would argue to just min max on the one camera. Overall a better camera, maybe not as versatile, but meh.
gayhitler420@lemm.ee 11 months ago
Digital zooming fucking sucks though and is only as good as the quality of the optics/the sensor resolution. At that point you might as well go schmitt cassegrain instead, especially when you’re taking the top shelf binned sensors anyway.
corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 11 months ago
That seems to be what they want. Or, where do you keep your USBc<->3.5mm conversion dongle if not in the bag with your headphones, lens clip, etc – in your kitchen drawer.