Comment on 0/10 game
ddplf@szmer.info 3 days agoI don’t get it, it sounds to me you are advocating dropping side content in games.
Comment on 0/10 game
ddplf@szmer.info 3 days agoI don’t get it, it sounds to me you are advocating dropping side content in games.
Poojabber@lemmy.world 3 days ago
I dont think they are advocating dropping side content, but instead saying that having side content that is hidden or has no direction can take fun out of a game. For example, in OG pokemon games there are “hidden” items that have no hints or clues that they exist. If you walk to certain spots and press the action button you can find hidden items, but since there are no clues or indicators that they are there, it encourages just walking around and mashing buttons for the entire game in case there is another hidden item, which is the opposite of fun.
vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 3 days ago
I think it depends on the game, for example Fallout 2 kinda does this. The earliest 10mm pistol is found in a cave under Klamath just on the ground with which it blends in, but you can highlight it with a button press. Similarly some good shit is hidden in weird corners of KOTOR 1 & 2 but those games are linear enough that a random path teaches you that there’s probably something to do.
chromatic_aberration@discuss.tchncs.de 3 days ago
Pokémon is a good example. There is no item in the trash cans throughout the whole game (the originals). I and many others do check every trash can ever. And the reason is managing motivation. The game teaches you that there might be something of value and that is a heavy hitter on your dopamine. Directing the motivation towards disappointment is the essence of bad game design.