1440p is the sweet spot for me for a 27 inch screen. Agreed on the need for high refresh ratez though
Comment on Apple’s engineers carefully designing the last 60 Hz OLED screens on the planet
Funkt4st1c@lemmy.world 2 days agoId rather 144hz at 1080p than 60hz at 4k. My eyes arent good enough and my brain isnt quick enough to see those tiny details you lose at 1080p, but god i hate low framerates.
I hate interpolation even more, and upscaling makes me wanna kill a guy. Just rawdog 1080p 144 times a second please
meekah@discuss.tchncs.de 1 day ago
warm@kbin.earth 1 day ago
Nothing scales right at 1440p. 1080p was standard for so long that everything was made for it. Then 1440p comes along, 33.3333333333333333333...% bigger and it cant scale, so everything ends up bigger or smaller than intended.
4K is at least 100% bigger, so its just a better definition 1080p.
For games, there's no reason we cant have 4K and high framerates with current hardware, well... except for money, publishers/developers dont want to spend the time.meekah@discuss.tchncs.de 1 day ago
I’m not scaling anything on my 1440p monitor, though I see your point.
Junkers_Klunker@feddit.dk 2 days ago
I’m with you on this one. 1080p is perfect for me, higher might technically be better but I’m not sitting close enough for that to matter. What does matter though is framerate, but I will rather settle for a low fps if it is stable rather than high fps with low 1%.