They don’t do it as well as ubo
Comment on Firefox’s new ad tries to remind you of a time before the internet sucked.
artyom@piefed.social 3 days agoSeveral Chromium browsers have native adblocking built in at this point. No extensions required.
pimento64@sopuli.xyz 3 days ago
artyom@piefed.social 3 days ago
They do. It works exactly the same.
one_old_coder@piefed.social 3 days ago
artyom@piefed.social 3 days ago
It’s not impossible. mv3 pertains to extensions and, as I said, it’s not an extension, it’s built into the browser itself.
pimento64@sopuli.xyz 2 days ago
No, ublock origin actually has specialized features that in-browser adblockers don’t replicate.
Blisterexe@lemmy.zip 2 days ago
I know helium is a chromium browser and maintains their own manifest v3 fork of Ublock, but it might be temporary.
beejjorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org 3 days ago
Which is great, for sure. But, additionally, I’m unwilling to go back to a single engine ecosystem, especially not one with Google’s hands on it. I still remember coding around IE6. 😅
artyom@piefed.social 3 days ago
Google funds Firefox so it has their hands on it anyway. And Mozilla has proven to be a poor steward of Firefox anyway. I’m just not so sure one is better than the other anymore.
Ghoelian@piefed.social 2 days ago
Yes but Google doesn’t have any say over features Mozilla implements. However yes, Mozilla has been going in the wrong direction entirely without Google’s involvement for a while now. But it’s still better than supporting Google’s ecosystem.
beejjorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org 2 days ago
I’ll readily admit FF has problems. But it’s most definitely MHO that Google is far, far more evil. It’s not clear why they fund FF other than the antitrust angle.