Comment on Bloodborne is now on PC natively with online features like massages, bloodstains and co-op
REDACTED@infosec.pub 1 day agoIt’s their project that was based on existing game.
Comment on Bloodborne is now on PC natively with online features like massages, bloodstains and co-op
REDACTED@infosec.pub 1 day agoIt’s their project that was based on existing game.
Railcar8095@lemmy.world 1 day ago
They did nothing aside from the instructions. So their project is setting the agent, not the result of the agent.
REDACTED@infosec.pub 1 day ago
So when I use Photoshop that’s filled with AI tools or After Effects with AI 3D tracking to accelerate my project, it’s not my project because the work was made easier because of modern tools?
It’s a yes or no question.
Railcar8095@lemmy.world 1 day ago
It’s a false equivalence, and so clear I can’t believe you don’t know it.
RumRunningDevil@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
Prompting an AI agent is not the same as using photoshop. It is more comparable to commissioning something (art, code, writing, etc). You don’t have authorship, the LLM does in this case. That doesn’t mean you can’t own the piece that gets created, that’s what commissioning is, you just can’t claim you authored it. Though whether you or the company that runs the model owns the output is still not a settled question legally speaking.
FatCrab@slrpnk.net 22 hours ago
No, this is pretty settled. Generative outputs such as these are not owned by anyone. As you said, the AI “authored” it similarly to a commissioned work and cannot hold a copyright so there was nothing to assign to the prompt writer.
REDACTED@infosec.pub 17 hours ago
Last I checked, AI creations cannot be copyrighted if human work was not involved (no human - no copyrights). This means that if you had to do something by yourself, even compiling, then there was human. While for AI generated images it’s quite clear you will not own it, but software tends to be more advanced, ChatGPT doesn’t just send you an exe file, you have to put it together by yourself.