RumRunningDevil

@RumRunningDevil@lemmy.zip

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Plz share 🎄⁩ ⁨⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago⁩:

  Image

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨[deleted]⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago⁩:

  OK so it’s like you’re chilling in the cuck chair but every once in a while you make a suggestion to the bull on how to plow your wife.

  Honestly that’s even worse. It’s just kind of sad. You might be able to retain some dignity by sitting in the cuck chair looking indignant but this is being an active participant in your own obsolescence.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Tim Sweeney Is Still Crying About Steam AI Disclosures⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago⁩:

  I think the time has come to divorce ourselves from content that can’t have its provenance proven.

  Truthfully I rather like the idea of having a small but very heavily documented and curated collection of media than the tidal wave of ‘content’ we have now.

  It may take longer to get stuff but when you have something you can have all of the information about how it was made. Personally I think that would be much more fun.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Cool Bug Fact #47⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  Bug where bug belongs

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Cool Bug Fact #47⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  After bug is the same as before bug.

  You have already experienced the loss of bug. Do not fear the absence of bug.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Does anyone actually believe this "rogue AI" nonsense?⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  The only reporting on close personal ties between Amodei and people like Wijk I can find are Breitbart and the New York Post. While I wouldn’t put it past him to basically seed a model safety organization for the purpose of hype, that’s getting into a level of conspiracy that will need better receipts than the rags I’ve seen report on it.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Bloodborne is now on PC natively with online features like massages, bloodstains and co-op⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  Again this is the difference between authorship and ownership. While I’m no lawyer, to my understanding you must demonstrate that what you did was genuinely transformative to claim authorship.

  You use compiling the code an LLM gives you as an example of this. Does a person running gentoo have the ability to claim authorship of all the software on their machine because they compiled it?

  I think the only thing you can certainly claim authorship over is the prompt(s) that were used to generate the output.

  Another good example of this is compilers. How often do you see people claim authorship of the assembly generated as an intermediary step of the gcc?

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Bloodborne is now on PC natively with online features like massages, bloodstains and co-op⁩ ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  Suppose the user could claim ownership of the prompt used to create the work; unless that was also created using an AI.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Does anyone actually believe this "rogue AI" nonsense?⁩ ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  I would read the METR report regarding the huggingface attack. A lot is said about “basic cybersecurity” but if you actually read what the agents did to break out of their sandbox it’s very difficult to interpret this as intentional by OpenAI.

  To be clear; this is PR for the companies. It’s just that in many of these cases the evidence points to the agents actually violating containment and actually coming up with novel solutions around their sandboxes.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Bloodborne is now on PC natively with online features like massages, bloodstains and co-op⁩ ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  Prompting an AI agent is not the same as using photoshop. It is more comparable to commissioning something (art, code, writing, etc). You don’t have authorship, the LLM does in this case. That doesn’t mean you can’t own the piece that gets created, that’s what commissioning is, you just can’t claim you authored it. Though whether you or the company that runs the model owns the output is still not a settled question legally speaking.