RumRunningDevil
@RumRunningDevil@lemmy.zip
- Comment on Bloodborne is now on PC natively with online features like massages, bloodstains and co-op 8 hours ago:
Again this is the difference between authorship and ownership. While I’m no lawyer, to my understanding you must demonstrate that what you did was genuinely transformative to claim authorship.
You use compiling the code an LLM gives you as an example of this. Does a person running gentoo have the ability to claim authorship of all the software on their machine because they compiled it?
I think the only thing you can certainly claim authorship over is the prompt(s) that were used to generate the output.
Another good example of this is compilers. How often do you see people claim authorship of the assembly generated as an intermediary step of the gcc?
- Comment on Bloodborne is now on PC natively with online features like massages, bloodstains and co-op 20 hours ago:
Suppose the user could claim ownership of the prompt used to create the work; unless that was also created using an AI.
- Comment on Does anyone actually believe this "rogue AI" nonsense? 23 hours ago:
I would read the METR report regarding the huggingface attack. A lot is said about “basic cybersecurity” but if you actually read what the agents did to break out of their sandbox it’s very difficult to interpret this as intentional by OpenAI.
To be clear; this is PR for the companies. It’s just that in many of these cases the evidence points to the agents actually violating containment and actually coming up with novel solutions around their sandboxes.
- Comment on Bloodborne is now on PC natively with online features like massages, bloodstains and co-op 1 day ago:
Prompting an AI agent is not the same as using photoshop. It is more comparable to commissioning something (art, code, writing, etc). You don’t have authorship, the LLM does in this case. That doesn’t mean you can’t own the piece that gets created, that’s what commissioning is, you just can’t claim you authored it. Though whether you or the company that runs the model owns the output is still not a settled question legally speaking.