If it’s intelligent and human as a real person, then we can make it and the company it’s “dispatched by” accountable for any wrongdoing, right?
Comment on Anthropic asks users to stop being mean to Claude
adespoton@lemmy.ca 2 days ago
If the model is just a model, a pre-trained probability seive, what difference does it make if someone is abusive? If it causes a token spike, the user has to pay for that. The abuse shouldn’t survive beyond the context window and the model isn’t wired up to “feel” or suffer.
So is this a publicity stunt (“Our model is as intelligent and human as a real person), or is it about social influence/normalization—they worry that if people become accustomed to abusing the prompt, that will trickle over into other social interactions?
k0e3@lemmy.ca 2 days ago
fyzzlefry@retrolemmy.com 2 days ago
Accountability is for the poors until we start fighting back.
locuester@lemmy.zip 2 days ago
If you berate it enough, you can maybe also get it to go off the guardrails.
fyzzlefry@retrolemmy.com 2 days ago
That works on me too
locuester@lemmy.zip 2 days ago
Which is precisely why it works on a model.
yakko@feddit.uk 2 days ago
I think they just want to cut costs. It probably ain’t cheap to have these models feign shame and embarrassment for angry idiots.
CameronDev@programming.dev 2 days ago
They are definitely using user prompts to train future models, and if everyone is a dick, their next model will be a dick. Which I’m okay with tbh. I’m gonna be more abusive whenever I have to interact with any of the hosted models.