CameronDev
@CameronDev@programming.dev
- Comment on A highly integrated, high end, open source laptop. Attempt the impossible. 9 hours ago:
I dont think a rockchip SOC is high end, but the rest of it looks interesting.
- Comment on No more Bosch for me.. 3 days ago:
I think its a matter of perspective though. I have all the physical buttons I need, and even ones I dont need, so im happy. For you, yours doesn’t have all the functions you need, so obviously your not happy.
Both versions have delay, but I did lose half load and delicate. Gained some other programs though, but those aren’t useful. Funnily enough, neither version has a dedicated rinse.
Series 6 Integrated incase anyone else is interested:
- Comment on Discussion Thread: 🎨🪴Tuesday, 25 March 2025 3 days ago:
That is very irresponsible of them, that shouldn’t have happened over land.
I saw the shadow of a Chinook out of the office window, disappointed that I didn’t see it properly :(
- Comment on Australia on alert after UK detects world's first case of bird flu in sheep 3 days ago:
Bad time to start a Lamb Tartare restaurant :(
- Comment on No more Bosch for me.. 4 days ago:
The feature removal is nuanced thing worthy of more discussion. If Bosch had sold the dishwasher with a rinse button, and then disabled it via a firmware patch, I would be pissed as well. If Bosch are advertising a cloud only featured without making it clear its cloud only, also pissed. But Bosch shipping a dishwasher without a rinse button, that is less clear. Not all offline dishwashers have a rinse (I had an IKEA without a rinse cycle), so whether it is a standard feature or not is open for debate. It could be as simple as Bosch deciding to prioritise a difference cycle button instead? Features being removed from products is unfortunately nothing new, in all industries there are numerous examples, the only difference here is that with their app, Bosch can add it back in.
Remote start is the main reason for having it networked. They also advertise it with home assistant/homekit/googlehome/alexa connectivity, which isnt for everyone, but for some, that is a sellable feature. So its not necessarily true that the app directly makes money, it could simply be a feature that helps sell more machines.
Bosch are EU based, so any collected data should be protected by GDPR, although Im not EU, so they could be screwing me if they want. (I am also not a gdpr lawyer, so correct me if i am wrong here). I’d trust Bosch a lot more than a Chinese/US manufacturer, but I isolate it out of an abundance of paranoia.
- Comment on No more Bosch for me.. 4 days ago:
I still think its unnecessarily rude to call someone’s opinion/experience “pathetic”.
The rest, I absolutely agree with. Its not a Bosch problem, its that specific model of dishwasher for that specific user problem. If I were in their situation, I would return the dishwasher.
- Comment on No more Bosch for me.. 4 days ago:
Removing buttons definitely sucks. In my case, its a built in dishwasher, so space is already limited for buttons, and all the ones I need are there. So the cloud is 100% value add. I’d hate it as well if the app was my only choice for a feature.
- Comment on No more Bosch for me.. 4 days ago:
No need for name calling.
My dishwasher is completely fine without the cloud. Period. Full stop.
There is no need to put it on the network, but if you want to, and are paranoid, you can connect it to an isolated network. If you dont want to, dont, and the dishwasher will work.
There are valid use cases for the networking, beyond data collection, if you dont like it, dont use it. I do like it, and I’d rather support companies that do provide first party homeassistant support.
- Comment on No more Bosch for me.. 4 days ago:
The line between “optional add”, and “base features” will differ per user, so personally, mine can do everything I need it to on the controls, and the cloud stuff is value add.
My only complaint with Bosch is that my washing machine from the same vintage doesn’t have any remote start features, so i can’t run it via homeassistant.
- Comment on No more Bosch for me.. 4 days ago:
The one way issue is very easily solved (isolated network), and on my model at least, all functionality is available. The app gives more, but everything I need is available on the buttons if I need it.
- Comment on No more Bosch for me.. 4 days ago:
I actually really like my Bosch dishwasher + home connect. You can hook it up with home assistant, and use that to run the dishwasher when solar is working.
Local access would be nice, but homeconnect isnt that bad, and has been improving.
- Comment on Why can’t HVAC be made smarter? 1 week ago:
If your willing to get into the weeds, most HVACs are very basic, and you can easily make your own thermostat with a cheap relay board. That plus a microcontroller and some code (and/or homeassistant) and you can make it as smart as you like.
There are smarter thermostats, but they are usually more expensive.
- Comment on [deleted] 2 weeks ago:
You might need to specify the wound placement. I’d change a dressing on a leg or a foot of a colleague or acquaintance, but if its a more sensitive area that might require an actual friend.
Can you go to a medical clinic or ER and get it changed?
- Comment on [deleted] 2 weeks ago:
Vigilantism is bad because of the slippery slope issue. It starts with solid proof, and then slowly declines towards “vibes”, or fabrication of proof.
“Beyond reasonable doubt” is the high bar set by the legal system, and they have the processes in place to ensure that the bar is met before declaring guilt (its not perfect, but it is so far the best system we have).
If the proof is solid, and the law enforcement is functional, its better to hand it to them and let the system do its job. If the law enforcement isnt functional, vigilantism is all that is left, but you should strive to meet the “beyond reasonable doubt” bar. E.g is the evidence good, do you have the right person, could someone else be framing/manipulating the facts.
- Comment on New Botnet Dubbed “Eleven11bot” Hacked 30,000 Webcams 2 weeks ago:
primarily security cameras and network video recorders (NVRs)
Referring to security cameras and recorders as webcams is irresponsible clickbait. Its just needlessly drumming up fear in the general public, who won’t read the article and will now think their webcam is infected.
- Comment on Woman arrested with python down her pants at Melbourne train station 2 weeks ago:
And you call yourself 'stralyan… Python down the pants is the quintessential Australian right of passage prank. For extra flare, slather it in Vegemite before you do it.
- Comment on You knew it was coming: Google begins testing AI-only search results 3 weeks ago:
Thanks, I’ve been on the fence for a while, doing the free trial now
- Comment on Why's everyone freaking out about Firefox Terms of Service? Isn't it Open Source? 3 weeks ago:
This has happened before in the software world, and its usually not a huge deal after a little bit of rockiness.
OpenOffice->LibreOffice. ddwrt->openwrt->tomato etc.
Development will continue, but maybe in a less resourced fashion.
- Comment on Why's everyone freaking out about Firefox Terms of Service? Isn't it Open Source? 3 weeks ago:
I’m aware that history is against them. The one thing in Firefox’s (not Mozilla) favour is that its open source. The browser and codebase will live on even if Mozilla crashes and burns.
The forks already exist, the only “moat” that Mozilla has is trust and goodwill, which they are burning rapidly.
- Comment on Why's everyone freaking out about Firefox Terms of Service? Isn't it Open Source? 3 weeks ago:
The angle I was thinking along was that if Mozilla was prevented from making those data transfers, then their browser becomes worthless. So in reverse, by making the transfers, their browser gains value. The obvious problem with that interpretation is that its basically impossible not to make a sale, as every transfer provides value - which very much defeats the purpose of the definition. (Not a lawyer, just an internet idiot, and I very much hope your definition is correct)
Spinning them out would have been preferable to me as well, and tbh, at this stage, I think I would prefer if firefox was spun out of Mozilla entirely. It really deserves to be managed by something like the Linux foundation or some other not-for-profit steward.
- Comment on Why's everyone freaking out about Firefox Terms of Service? Isn't it Open Source? 3 weeks ago:
If the legal definition of a term has changed such that their current activities now fall under it, changing the terms of use legal document does make sense.
They are pretty clear that under California law, they are “selling” data. They have two options, keep the ToU document the same, and try meet the new laws requirements (which as I’ve said in other comments, seems impossible for a browser - not a lawyer though), or update their ToU without changing their current behaviors.
They have gone with the latter, but it does also allow them to be far more “evil”. Its definitely the first step down a bad road, time will tell if they go further.
If you want to play it safe, block their domains via pihole: wiki.mozilla.org/Websites/…/Mozilla_Owned
- Comment on Why's everyone freaking out about Firefox Terms of Service? Isn't it Open Source? 3 weeks ago:
I’m not a lawyer, but “other valuable consideration” seems very broad. For DNS, getting the returned IP address is valuable. Ditto for http, getting the returned webpage is valuable?
I only suggested the translation thing because it (imo) fell under a “transfer of data for value provided”, which makes it a sale?
- Comment on Why's everyone freaking out about Firefox Terms of Service? Isn't it Open Source? 3 weeks ago:
Its even more broad than that, because its any exchange of data for valuable consideration. No money has to change hands, but if it benefits FF, its a sale. And the benefit could simply be “if we do this we will function correctly as a browser”.
- Comment on Why's everyone freaking out about Firefox Terms of Service? Isn't it Open Source? 3 weeks ago:
Yup. And it doesn’t help that they have been throwing away good will for a while now, with their crypto/AI/etc bandwagon jumping. They are still the least worst option, as I dont trust the forks either, but its getting hard to trust them.
- Comment on Why's everyone freaking out about Firefox Terms of Service? Isn't it Open Source? 3 weeks ago:
Yup, its been terribly handled. Dunno if it was driven by a panicy lawyer, but those steps would have been much better. At a minimum, that blog post should have come first.
- Comment on Why's everyone freaking out about Firefox Terms of Service? Isn't it Open Source? 3 weeks ago:
Yeah, its definitely wide open for abuse now. But the California law also seems way too vague as well. What about DNS lookup? That takes a users input and transfers it to someone else, is that a “sale”? Can hardly start separating that out of the browser? Http requests? Its all users initiated, but is it a “sale” in California? Not a lawyer, haven’t a clue.
- Comment on Why's everyone freaking out about Firefox Terms of Service? Isn't it Open Source? 3 weeks ago:
The rationalization they have given is that legally, they may have been seeking data all along, as some jurisdictions define it extremely loosely.
For example, if you use their translation feature, they are sending the page your looking at (data) to a third party, which provides a benefit to Mozilla.
blog.mozilla.org/en/…/update-on-terms-of-use/
| The reason we’ve stepped away from making blanket claims that “We never sell your data” is because, in some places, the LEGAL definition of “sale of data” is broad and evolving. As an example, the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) defines “sale” as the “selling, renting, releasing, disclosing, disseminating, making available, transferring, or otherwise communicating orally, in writing, or by electronic or other means, a consumer’s personal information by [a] business to another business or a third party” in exchange for “monetary” or “other valuable consideration.”
- Comment on What happened to cylindrical plugs? 3 weeks ago:
The 3rd gen iPod shuffles used the headphone port for USB, definitely uncommon though.
- Comment on What really separates a PC from a server? Mainly the hardware, but I guess software too. 4 weeks ago:
For media hosting, you can go an incredibly long way without needing to dip into “server grade” hardware.
An old desktop with a GPU and plenty of storage will be just fine, especially if you are only serving a few clients.
ECC isnt really that important, you’ll likely never notice if you get a memory error.
The one major advantage desktop PC hardware has is power usage and noise. They are generally quiet and reasonably power efficient, which matters a lot.
My advice would be to start small on an old desktop, and then upgrade when you actually hit a limitation of your current hardware.
- Comment on What really separates a PC from a server? Mainly the hardware, but I guess software too. 4 weeks ago:
Pretty much software. Servers predominately run services that other computers use (web server, file server, etc). PCs may run some of those things as well, which blurs the line, but the software they run is meant for direct usage by the end user (word processing, browser, media player).
Hardware wise, at the high end, the hardware is definitely different, but there is a lot of cross over at the mid and low end. The self-hosting community use a lot of consumer grade PCs as their server hardware.