Comment on UK train operator nationalised by government after 30 years of privatisation
Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I’m sure that “certain people” got very rich in those 30 years, which was the actual goal.
Comment on UK train operator nationalised by government after 30 years of privatisation
Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I’m sure that “certain people” got very rich in those 30 years, which was the actual goal.
FishFace@piefed.social 1 day ago
Ah yes, “those expressing ideologies other than mine don’t actually believe them”
Goodeye8@piefed.social 1 day ago
You sure you commented in the right place? In the context of comment you replied to your comment makes no sense.
FishFace@piefed.social 1 day ago
OP thinks that the actual goal of privatisation was not ideological, but grift. Nobody ever has any evidence for this kind of assertion - it’s always a combination of:
It’s so bizarre. Thatcher and her party were ideologues and all the evidence points that way. The whole position that enriching private investors was “the actual goal” is based on a lack of imagination around people holding different viewpoints.
In the case of privatisation in the UK, there was a long precedent with much ink spilled on the subject, but people like the OP discount it because they believe so strongly that anyone in power would be able to foresee the outcome, agree that the outcome was bad, and hence the only explanation was corruption.
Rothe@piefed.social 1 day ago
I am not seeing any contradiction here. Yes they were ideologues. And the purpose of their ideology was exactly to enrich private investors.
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 hours ago
You’re right, it’s a combination of both.
Not everyone is in on the grift, but they still need popular support so they convince the lowest common denominator that it’s good for them somehow.