I know it’s obvious, but shouldn’t it be plastic > reusable cotton > single-use plastic > paper
Comment on Every. Time.
Telodzrum@lemmy.world 1 day agoIt’s a complex question to answer. But, basically reusable plastic > reusable cotton > plastic > paper
danekrae@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Telodzrum@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Oh, yes. That is more specific and better communicates the list.
turtlesareneat@piefed.ca 1 day ago
The article briefly mentions this, but having lived in states with plastic bag bans, and states without - well drive through the countryside and count all the plastic bags in ditches, trees, streams. Paper might be more intensive to produce, but the lingering effects of plastic bags are being underestimated I think.
HereIAm@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I always feel it’s so dishonest comparing the energy requirement between plastic and paper. Yes, paper takes a lot to produce, planting them, machinery for harvest, processing and so on. But energy is practically infinite with solar power. And while alive the trees are working as carbon capture, and when the bag gets thrown on the ground it puts the carbon back into the soil. I wonder how many paperbags have killed fish and turtles compared to plastic ones.
HerbGrower@slrpnk.net 1 day ago
I hate paper bags as they are so weak and just can’t reasonably be reused
BlindPenguin@piefed.social 1 day ago
Might be worth considering wicker baskets. Ideally from someone who produces them locally. They might also be able to fix them, so they hold up a bit longer. Or make it yourself. Can be a fun project.
Telodzrum@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Yeah, the breakdown in impact doesn’t cover the qualitative difference with the elimination of disposable bags.