You’re saying there’s a reason he couldn’t just give the money now? That’s the difference. There’s now reason he wouldn’t get it passed through right now he’s just trying to buy votes.
You’re saying there’s a reason he couldn’t just give the money now? That’s the difference. There’s now reason he wouldn’t get it passed through right now he’s just trying to buy votes.
FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 1 week ago
He wont give the money out ever no matter how people vote.
PwnTra1n@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Ok so there’s no reason he can’t just try and pass it now and he’s just trying to buy votes. Thanks for finally agreeing
FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 1 week ago
You would hypothetically get the 5k no matter who you voted for. Thats how government policies work.
Idk what you’re not understanding.
PwnTra1n@lemmy.world 1 week ago
In the article you posted he just admitted in his own words that he won’t do it with the dems in the house. He does have final say in what gets passed in the end. He literally won’t “do it” unless they win. That means even if it was tried to be put through by dems he would spitefully veto. That’s his offer. He isn’t trying to pass 5k for people and dems are shutting it down he’s buying votes with a lie. Idk what you’re not understanding