Not even. It wasn’t the same hand that wrote those letters.
Maybe a server wrote it after the fact, or maybe the client did to get story and a free dinner.
Comment on A fine dining restaurant served a quadriplegic woman a desert that read "happy birthday wheelchair"
tal@lemmy.today 1 week ago
If I had to make a bet, there’s some note about what dish is supposed to go to whom and the waiter let it merge into the note about what text was supposed to be there.
Not even. It wasn’t the same hand that wrote those letters.
Maybe a server wrote it after the fact, or maybe the client did to get story and a free dinner.
Hmm. Could be.
searches
www.msn.com/en-us/…/ar-AA2aMzua
A spokesperson for Blu On The Hudson sent CBS News New York the following statement:
"We at Blu on the Hudson are aware of the recent video circulating on social media, and we are deeply saddened by what occurred. We sincerely apologize to the guest and to everyone who was hurt or offended by this incident which took place on June 20, 2026. Treating every guest with dignity, respect, and care is fundamental to who we are as a company.
"We want to provide some context regarding what happened, not as an excuse, but to explain how this unfortunate mistake occurred.
"Our standard operating procedure is to use table and seat numbers on tickets to identify where each dish should be delivered. In this instance, the word “wheelchair” was used as a reference to identify where a birthday dessert with a candle should be delivered. Unfortunately, that notation was misunderstood and was written on the plate itself. There was absolutely no malicious or disrespectful intent behind the notation. However, we fully understand how seeing that word written on a plate could be deeply hurtful and upsetting.
"Since the incident, we have reinforced with our team the importance of following proper ticketing and communication procedures and have taken steps to ensure that something like this does not happen again. We have also made an attempt to reach the guest directly to personally apologize, although we have not yet been able to connect with them.
"We understand that an apology cannot undo the hurt or frustration caused by this incident, but we sincerely hope it conveys how deeply sorry we are. Blu on the Hudson is proud to be a part of the Hudson County community, and we are committed to being a place where every guest feels welcomed, respected, and valued.
“We are deeply sorry for this occurrence, have learned from it, and are committed to doing better moving forward.”
That’s a well crafted PR response that does it’s best to accept responsibility and give a plausible explanation, which is what’s expected. Doesn’t mean its true.
It doesn’t really fit well with what’s in the image to my eyes though.
Maybe a second person saw the ticket, thought someone missed a word and added it, but that doesn’t make sense at a high end place to have just anybody doing lettering.
Looking at that ‘Happy Birthday’ on a plate and thinking something needed to be added, I would not want to touch that perfect cursive even if I had similarly impressive flow, I can’t imagine the different shape wouldn’t be acceptable at a place like that.
Well the other explanation is that someone did it maliciously knowing it would cost them their job
10/10 apology; would forgive.
That begs a larger conversation about what is and isn’t ok to say informally at work.
Certainly “wheelchair” is not itself malicious and is less likely to be mistake prone than Seat 34a, especially if there’s only one patron in the room seated in a wheelchair. At the same time, the affected person might not enjoy being referred to by their disability.
I’m honestly not sure what the best solution is. Certainly, “red sweater” is less likely to cause offense than “black dude,” and 99% of the time these won’t be customer facing. I’m torn on whether the mistake was purely in writing it in the wrong location vs. whether the company as a whole should do better.
I know in the corporate world you typically don’t write down anything you don’t want read back to you later, and the fact that they realize the patron could be offended suggests that maybe they should adopt a similar policy of “never write down anything you wouldn’t want a customer to see.” At the same time, I’m aware most restaurants are not corporate culture and aren’t trying to be.
The seat itself is probably being identified as ‘wheelchair’, not who’s using it. Wheelchair seating had different dimensions and no seat, so it a restaurant is small enough to only need 1 wheelchair accessible seat to be in compliance they might just call it the wheelchair seat instead of seat 8.
Kowowow@lemmy.ca 1 week ago
Very much an autopilot mistake, not in food business but I’ve done almost exactly the same thing
tal@lemmy.today 1 week ago
There’s an infamous incident in the Battle of Leyte Gulf, near the end of World War II.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_world_wonders