Comment on "No precedent in American history!" NYT would have defended child labor.
ReluctantZen@feddit.nl 2 weeks ago
Maybe it’s my English, but I don’t read this as NYT defending the current US medical system
Comment on "No precedent in American history!" NYT would have defended child labor.
ReluctantZen@feddit.nl 2 weeks ago
Maybe it’s my English, but I don’t read this as NYT defending the current US medical system
VelvetPinkOtter123@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
It’s not. The people in this sub didn’t read the article, they’re just reacting to the headline
It’s a 7 year old news article about the potential economic impacts of proposed sweeping reforms to health care in the United States.
It’s literally just an article for economists and investors about potential changes to the market
The quote isn’t even the focus of the article, it’s just one guy pointing out that there’s really nothing to base our predictions on because nothing like these proposed changes has happened before. Health Care is a trillion dollar industry that employs over half a million people nation wide and these companies stocks are popular among retirement accounts.
Nobody is saying single-payer health care is bad, in fact the article even points out the positives, it’s questioning what happens to peoples retirements funds and jobs and what impact would that have on the market as a whole and the economy in both the long and short term
FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Retirement accounts are a real issue, but could be solved by having the top wealthiest shareholders pay out to the poorest shareholders until retirements are guaranteed. This could also be combined with Social Security reform that requires wealthy people to contribute more and extract less from the system.
Presumably many of the actual healthcare workers and some of the admin workers would still be needed in a nationalized system. The insurance agents and related admin can all get other jobs. No one dreams of being an insurance agent as a kid, these people would be free to pursue more meaningful and useful work.
None of these are insurmountable problems for a government that actually serves the people instead of money. This article is just prevarication to cover our current governments inaction.
VelvetPinkOtter123@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
If you’re asking people who have a vested interest in maintaining the status quo, then of course the problems are insurmountable. I never claimed to have all of the answers, but I know for damn sure that it is a lie that there is no solution, as these “experts” seem to be implying.
Also, no need to be so fucking rude.
Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
because they’re propagandists for the epstein class
jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
plenty of people dream of causing as much harm to as many people as possible, and insurance agents are kinda close to that
Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
it’s not even true, it’s a false premise – single payer medicare for all wouldn’t ban anything private, in fact medicare itself works alongside private coverage for wealthy individuals and has done so for many decades. it’s nonsense at every level.
VelvetPinkOtter123@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Aw man, if only you had actually read the article…
Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
If only they didn’t publish a clickbait bullshit tweet
Tiger666@lemmy.ca 2 weeks ago
Save the markets they said, it will ruin most people like you they said, they dont want their hegemony over health terminated like some stupid ass CEO shot in the street like a dog as they enter their earnings call while stepping over his body.
VelvetPinkOtter123@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
The article doesn’t say any of that
ReluctantZen@feddit.nl 2 weeks ago
I mean, so am I.