Well it does specify “American history” meaning the US here.
Comment on "No precedent in American history!" NYT would have defended child labor.
Rothe@piefed.social 4 weeks agoNot in the US, but elsewhere yes.
Saapas@piefed.zip 4 weeks ago
Comment on "No precedent in American history!" NYT would have defended child labor.
Rothe@piefed.social 4 weeks agoNot in the US, but elsewhere yes.
Well it does specify “American history” meaning the US here.
ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Funny how the Supreme Court used precedents from other countries, some from before the US even existed, to overturn Roe v. Wade.