Comment on one step closer to 100%'ing life!!

• LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  What was their mission statement? Here’s a picture that you own the copyright of? I don’t see how they could ever make sense unless they were legitimately fabulous images that people loved and wanted to buy prints of

  source

  • Nerdulous@lemmy.zip ⁨3⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    To own a digital asset that only had one original. Something that could have an identifiable, singular owner despite being a digital asset. Problem is no one gives a shit if you’re the original, provable “owner” of a jpg someone else made. Which makes these worthless to all but idiots who fell for it.

    source

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world ⁨34⁩ ⁨minutes⁩ ago

      The dumbest thing in all this is that NFTs could have been legitimately useful for a bunch of tasks, but the whole thing got burned by cryptobros.

      source
    • Kolanaki@pawb.social ⁨3⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      You didn’t even own the JPG; you owned a receipt for the JPG.

      source