You don’t have a clue what the word capitalism means
Comment on Why does China have so many multi billionaires if they are aiming to be a communist country?
Racoonwithbenefits@lemmy.zip 3 weeks ago
China is a capitalist country
They focus their government money on creating jobs and control. People will well paying jobs and money for fun stuff are less likely to start a civil war
Rather than the US where the focus is making themselves richer and funding the military
Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 2 weeks ago
Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de 2 weeks ago
Can you have oligarchs in a communist country?
Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 2 weeks ago
Oligarchs definitionally have institutional power, if the billionaires were in charge in China corruption wouldn’t have a death sentence, simple as
raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
definitionally
That’s not English. Maybe don’t go lecturing others about capitalism when you have to invent words for your (flawed) reasoning.
lechekaflan@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
People will well paying jobs and money for fun stuff are less likely to start a civil war
Depends on what part of Mainland China, as there’s glaring class struggle within. Of course, anyone says otherwise will have Xi quietly sending in riot police.
Kolanaki@pawb.social 3 weeks ago
Funding the military so they can quash any rebellions from people having nothing left to lose deciding to rise up.
Formfiller@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
They also basically told us to overthrow the government and rewrite the constitution in our situation
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, -That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
WoodScientist@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Unfortunately the “no standing army” thing was a product of a certain age. When the fastest an army could move is via sail or a trotting horse, you can get away with not having a standing army. In the months it took your enemy to reach you, you could train and prepare. Standing armies always had some advantage, but it was actually possible to maintain a viable defense without one.
But today? The enemy army will be occupying your capital before you can even send all the draft notices out. Imagine if Ukraine had had no standing army when Russia invaded. And that’s just with how quick ground armies can move. We haven’t even mentioned aircraft and paratroopers!
Sure, there are a handful of countries with no standing army today, but they’re countries that simply don’t need a credible defense. Iceland has no army. But an Iceland without an army would perform in war only slightly worse than an Iceland that was as devoted to war as the historical Spartans. Iceland could tax themselves into oblivion and put every citizen they could in uniform, but they just don’t have the population to credibly deter an invasion by a major power. The only countries without standing armies today are very small countries that, due to their population, are completely dependent on outside allies for their defense.
dreamkeeper@literature.cafe 2 weeks ago
They should’ve banned it in the Constitution then. Though given how bloodthirsty Americans turned out to be, we probably would’ve amended it anyway.