The jobs that are easy to part time to avoid benefits are already doing so. This doesn’t really move the needle on that.
Though, it would be a good thing to address that at some point.
laranis@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
“Rise in the number of part time employees surges as employers exploit this one loophole.”
The jobs that are easy to part time to avoid benefits are already doing so. This doesn’t really move the needle on that.
Though, it would be a good thing to address that at some point.
What should happen is part-time employees should receive the same leave, proportional to the actual amount of time/days worked.
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Didn’t this already happen under Obamacare?
A bunch of service sector employers tried to schedule their staff at under 32 hours while still squeezing them for 40+ hours of work. Everyone hated the system, because it continued to leave the onus of health care on individual employers, while private premiums climbed. And then the courts + Trump Admin defanged any effective enforcement.
What a great system. So glad we weren’t simply covering everyone with Medicaid by default.
andros_rex@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Yep! So instead of one full time job you had to juggle multiple part time jobs because a lot of business watch your hours like a hawk.