Still, to what end?
Comment on WWE wants to trademark the term 'Vice City'.
RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world 4 days ago
It’s only within the context of professional wrestling. Verizon has a trademark on the color red, but it’s only within the context of cell phones.
tacosanonymous@mander.xyz 4 days ago
RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world 4 days ago
I assume it’s a new tag team, or something along those lines. This makes it so a rival promoter can’t use the same name for a different tag team, or sell competing merchandise. That sort of thing. Someone could still open “Vice City Coffee Co.” and sell shirts and it wouldn’t be directly competing with them at all.
siv9939@lemmy.zip 4 days ago
WWE currenty has a
wrestlerSuperstar going by Lola Vice and Vice City has been used in relation to her. She recently left their developmental brand and is heading to the main roster, so WWE will probably be selling Vice City shirts to fans.tacosanonymous@mander.xyz 4 days ago
Wild and super ick.
I hate Eric Bischoff but I loved that era. NWO was one of the funniest things I’d ever seen.
They should bring that back for Halloween or something.
RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 4 days ago
Its also a very hyper specific hex code of red, and any minor difference even a single hex digit difference is enough to not infringe, unless it is in combination with other marks they have.
They dont have just “red,” its like they have exactly #FF0A0A or whatever.
Business colors are very specific and deviate from other types of protection marks like that, for good reason. They need the extra “resolution.” (IYKYK)
rtxn@lemmy.world 4 days ago
On the other hand, Sky TV somehow managed to successfully sue Microsoft to force them to rename SkyDrive.
RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world 4 days ago
World Wildlife Fund successfully got WWF to switch to WWE. Now they have to blur out their own logo on old matches. It’s quite bizarre.
bobs_monkey@lemmy.zip 4 days ago
I always found that odd. You’d have to be a serious nonce to conflate dramatized wrestling with wildlife conservation, but here we are.
ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 4 days ago
They reached an agreement, but once wrestling started putting stiff on the Internet, that effectively broke that agreement.
smeg@feddit.uk 4 days ago
I’m just going off memory, but sky tv already provided computer-related services and products in Britain, so it’s not unreasonable for them not to want another company essentially using their name for a product that could quite easily be confused as to being associated with them
ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 4 days ago
Especially with how things went the last time a tech company was at odds with a British company over a name. Apple Records
smeg@feddit.uk 4 days ago
The Beatles got quite a lot of cash from Apple when they started selling music through iTunes, right?