Oh I sure do look forward to the well-reasoned and deeply nuanced explanation you’re sure to get in response to that question!
Oh I sure do look forward to the well-reasoned and deeply nuanced explanation you’re sure to get in response to that question!
01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 19 hours ago
Lol i was expecting something, too, but the answer is actually quite reasonable
Warl0k3@lemmy.world 18 hours ago
It’s civil which was nice, but it’s also an argument that is extremely poorly thought through. It’s just an appeal towards free-market regulation, which in an ideal world does work great but we have hundreds of years history that establishes this is not an ideal world.
It’s a good, optimistic, hope-for-the-future thought yes - but they’re using that to justify badmouthing DEI policies which is both incredibly counterproductive and pretty suspect.
MaggiWuerze@feddit.org 27 minutes ago
They are not really though, they are still agreeing that it is necessary, just that they wish it wasn’t. Which the people DEI is supposed to support would probably agree to