Comment on Sad man makes shitty posts, and shitty comments
chris@lemmy.grey.fail 1 day ago
So, while this user (and their many reincarnations) has really impacted my enjoyment of Lemmy over the last couple of weeks, they do highlight one of the larger shortcomings of the platform. There’s nothing stopping an unstable, disturbed, bored person from grinding through accounts. A problem on any platform, for sure. Though folks like this do seem to filter out in the nose of larger projects.
I don’t have a solution for this. But I’m nearly to the point of tearing down my own instance.
Sturgist@lemmy.ca 1 day ago
Yeah, that tracks. Without fed-wide IP blacklists or something, I suppose it’s really easy to just instance hop and be a dick. Or spin up your own and be a dick.
tidderuuf@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Allow me… To create a frontend framework that just hides content you don’t want to see… Maybe even a feature that hides users too… I’ll add in some keywords…
Ooh let’s call it Penteract!
skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Give me user access to view and modify this blocklist, and you have a deal
0ops@piefed.zip 1 day ago
…federating block-lists is actually an interesting idea. Instances already federate posts, comments, communities, and users. An instance could publish a public block-list, and admins of other instances could “subscribe” to block-lists across the fediverse that they trust, reducing some of the redundant labor of each instance’s admins maintaining their own separate block-lists. It’s kind of a similar idea to ublock origin’s various filter lists.
TherapyGary@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
I have a bot set up to mirror instance bans from blahaj and dbzer0 to my instance- it’s really convenient! (I set up monthly donations to not feel like a leach, but I didn’t see them come out this month- I should fix that…)
Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 1 day ago
Does that include defederation?