Comment on MoistReeves
Glitterkoe@lemmy.world 4 days ago
Same when cellular drops to one level below the current top of the line for consumers. 5G plus? Decent. 4G and lower? Fat shit through a funnel.
Comment on MoistReeves
Glitterkoe@lemmy.world 4 days ago
Same when cellular drops to one level below the current top of the line for consumers. 5G plus? Decent. 4G and lower? Fat shit through a funnel.
Hazel@piefed.blahaj.zone 4 days ago
Nah 5G is too unstable.
wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 4 days ago
Wait until you experience 5G UW, then you’ll be begging for the stability of standard 5G
Hazel@piefed.blahaj.zone 4 days ago
Maybe they’ll finally fix it with 5G UwU!
Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 4 days ago
I think it may be a problem in your zone or smth, it works great where i live
Hazel@piefed.blahaj.zone 4 days ago
The biggest issue is that 5G is very easily blocked by objects, including humans. It’s unavoidably very hard to get a strong stable signal in crowded places. In my humble opinion, the extra speed just isn’t worth the trade-off 🤷🏼
REDACTED@infosec.pub 3 days ago
If that would be true I’d not be getting excellent zone in my concrete jungle. You’re thinking of short-wavelength (mmWave) 5G which is rarely used (mostly in dense population areas like event venues), but most utilized towers run on similar frequencies as 4G.