Back in the Athlon days before heat spreaders everyone wrote about lapping the heatsink on glass so less thermal paste could be used.
Comment on More thermal paste = more heat dissipation, right?
Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca 1 month agoOptimal thermal paste thickness (bond-line thickness) is critical for heat dissipation. The layer should be thin, ideally between 25 µm and 50 µm, which is roughly the thickness of two sheets of standard paper. The paste’s sole purpose is to fill microscopic air pockets between the metal surfaces for better thermal conduction. Source, I spent 6 months in a laboratory experimenting with and producing thermal pastes and insulators. I spent days cutting and cleaning copper squares, applying the experimental pastes, and testing thermal conductivity via the application of Fourier’s Law of heat conduction.
Q = kA(Δ T/Δ X)
Where Q is heat flow, A is the cross-sectional area, and Δ x is the paste’s thickness.
That’s way more paste than you need for 50 µm application.
Drops Mic
Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 1 month ago
DeadDigger@lemmy.zip 1 month ago
To add to this to much is also a problem because it can trap air itself and create air pockets that way
ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Did you say 50mm of thermal paste?
Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
Microns, not milimeters. One micron in 1/1000 of a milimeter.
ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Ah, my bad. 1000. So 50km of thermal paste?
Dpek@lemmy.zip 1 month ago
You sure its not megameters?
Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 1 month ago
No! There’s no way to measure 50km accurately in your house. He obviously meant 50kg.
foodandart@lemmy.zip 1 month ago
I think he said 50m…
snooggums@piefed.world 1 month ago
50 miles is too far for paste