Yeah, more loaded questions, fucking sealioners.

For the sake of it I’ll explain, even though I’m obviously wasting my time:

• “outcome” of what? You’re asking questions with holes hoping that I’ll fill them for you
• AI code is not the same as AIs, you are mixing two different things together that weren’t, in the initial discussion
• "return to a pre-AI world" is worded to make it sound like “going back to the past before AIs”, that’s absurd and also tries to make it sound like the future has to have AI, all we can do is to delay the inevitable. That’s bullshit. The idea of destroying AI is to reach a “post-AI” word but that wording doesn’t fit your narrative
• we weren’t talking about beliefs of what is the likely outcome, but about what is the end goal. On top of that, why would it have to be likely? The nazis getting pushed back by the resistance was an unlikely outcome, and yet no one with a brain would say that it was stupid to resist. Morals are not about likelihood, they’re about what is acceptable and what is not.

All in all, you’re not talking in good faith, which is what I was expecting. Go do your AI propaganda somewhere else.