Comment on Men against bush
TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world 2 months agono, but considering the types of females that have no hair down there tend to be prepubecent (or have alopecia,) or the women who are concerned about early detection of STI’s, it does imply a kind of coding about the men who prefer it, rather than having no preference.
velma@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
Females and men.
wabasso@lemmy.ca 2 months ago
I was about to agree with you but I reread it. Women is used as well, and the sentence that uses females is about their biology not choice.
Still not accepting the argument about the implication on men’s coding though.
velma@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
There was no need to use “females” at all in that sentence structure.
TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world 2 months ago
It’s literally the subject of the thread. taps title
TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world 2 months ago
It’s supported farther down as a indicator that the man sees women as equating to children, or sees the woman as permisuous. I promise you that in either case, i’m calling out mysogyny.