Comment on Men against bush
You just made a blanket statement too ;)
I’m not sure that I have, actually — blanket generalizations are inherently deceitful.
None of the definitions I can find for blanket generalizations require deceit.
It’s simply a fallacy defined by inductive conclusions.
You unintentionally and in good faith made a paradox under the misunderstanding that deceit was required.
You don’t need to intend to be deceitful to be deceitful, just like you don’t need to intend to kill someone to kill them.
The world is not sweeping absolutes. Painting it as such always obscures some truth, this post is no different.
think anyone that makes blanket generalizations
That’s a sweeping absolute, but this conversation is obviously going nowhere, have a good one friend.
It’s a good thing the person in the video specified she’s taking about men who have the audacity to judge women’s bodies and body hair publicly then.
Jax@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
I’m not sure that I have, actually — blanket generalizations are inherently deceitful.
rumba@lemmy.zip 1 month ago
None of the definitions I can find for blanket generalizations require deceit.
It’s simply a fallacy defined by inductive conclusions.
You unintentionally and in good faith made a paradox under the misunderstanding that deceit was required.
Jax@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
You don’t need to intend to be deceitful to be deceitful, just like you don’t need to intend to kill someone to kill them.
The world is not sweeping absolutes. Painting it as such always obscures some truth, this post is no different.
rumba@lemmy.zip 1 month ago
That’s a sweeping absolute, but this conversation is obviously going nowhere, have a good one friend.
velma@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
It’s a good thing the person in the video specified she’s taking about men who have the audacity to judge women’s bodies and body hair publicly then.