In car i would never, because you cant hear or see shit, but on a bike why not?
Thatâs true, yes. Itâs allowed.
Comment on đđđ
unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de â¨14⊠â¨hours⊠agoIn car i would never, because you cant hear or see shit, but on a bike, when there is zero traffic and you can see far down all the roads then why not?
In car i would never, because you cant hear or see shit, but on a bike why not?
Thatâs true, yes. Itâs allowed.
Zombie@feddit.uk â¨12⊠â¨hours⊠ago
I donât think the term âdriveâ, which you used in the first comment, is generally associated with cycling.
I understand what youâre getting at about using your head, but unfortunately we live in a society that needs to cater to the lowest common denominator.
At 3am, when thereâs nobody around, and youâve slowed down and can see for absolute certainty thatâs itâs clear then yeah you could perhaps justifiably run the red light.
But then that concept gets normalised, people start pushing boundaries. Trying it at midnight when thereâs still some traffic and pedestrians around. Trying it at 4pm because âit was quietâ. Guess whatâs going to happen? Baring in mind how many terrible drivers you witness every single day.
With driving we need to apply Kantian principles.
Or more simply: âWhat if everybody did this?â
The purpose of the lights is to remove the requirement for everyoneâs judgement at junctions, because human judgement has been shown to often be poor and result in collisions. Yeah, sometimes it may be unoptimised and you have to wait an extra minute, but really, whatâs the rush?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kantian_ethics