I would think you random death would just be added to the baseline.
Comment on New mrbeast video is dark
imeansurewhynot@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
About 2 people are dying every second anyway regardless, so if i don’t take the money, 2 people die.
Im actually saving a life by briefly capping the death rare at 1.
remon@ani.social 2 days ago
imeansurewhynot@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
that was not a stipulation.
Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 days ago
I don’t know, I better take the money I think…
remon@ani.social 2 days ago
Well yes. But I think taking the money should actively kill someone, you can just get free money for a death that would happen anyway … that’s just free money.
hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 days ago
The next second 3 people dies, so you were just prolonging one’s suffering by 1 second
imeansurewhynot@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
Prolong an inevitable death by one second for $10,000.
Is that stackable?
petersr@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Sorry, but that’s not how it works. 3 people die that instant.
imeansurewhynot@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
The original scenario stipulates a single death.
I graciously accept saving a life and receiving $10,000.
HeHoXa@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
Honestly this seems like a pretty good representation of how powerful people cope with the consequences of their ambitions.
Bombastic@sopuli.xyz 1 day ago
Nuh-huh
fartographer@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Yeah-huh