Comment on oh no guys theyre gonna report us to the FBI
Wakmrow@lemmy.world 3 weeks agoI don’t think the first statement shouldn’t be tolerated.
Comment on oh no guys theyre gonna report us to the FBI
Wakmrow@lemmy.world 3 weeks agoI don’t think the first statement shouldn’t be tolerated.
Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
What you think doesn’t matter if it is objectively illegal.
EggInDisguise@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 weeks ago
Lmao imagine Arguing what is legal and what is illegal when discussing dealing with ICE and all the illegal shit they do with impunity every say
Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Yeah, impunity is the sticking point there lmao. You and I don’t have that nor should we nor should ICE.
HeHoXa@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
Mandela, Gandhi, MLK, Pankhurst… it’s not uncommon for someone to trigger revolution from behind bars.
In principle anyway. Not that any of the online idiots we’re talking about are on that kind of path.
Wakmrow@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
There is no such thing as objectively illegal.
Given the first amendment and the supreme courts stance on originalism one could make a compelling argument that this type of speech is legal. As an example. One could further point to any example of the current administration or the police or examine historical injustice codified into law. Or, just look at Israeli actions.
Laws are enforced by power. And are dictated by societal pressure. They are not objective in the slightest. There’s an entire profession dedicated to the subjectivity of laws.
Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
That’s one way to look at it.
Wakmrow@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
What does objective mean to you
CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 2 weeks ago
Legality and morality are two different things.
Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Correct