None of what you just said is accurate for the Andes variant
But it is.
There is poor evidence andes spreads person-to-person.
Here’s a recent meta analysis summary you won’ t read.
And here is the conclusions, from 22 studies, not one from some quack looking to be famous.
Results: Twenty-two studies met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis was not possible due to heterogeneity. With the exception of 1 prospective cohort study of ANDV in Chile with serious risk of bias, evidence from comparative studies (strongest level of evidence available) does not support human-to-human transmission of hantavirus infection. Noncomparative studies with a critical risk of bias suggest that human-to-human transmission of ANDV may be possible.
Conclusions: The balance of the evidence does not support the claim of human-to-human transmission of ANDV. Well-designed cohort and case-control studies that control for co-exposure to rodents are needed to inform public health recommendations.
Nomad@infosec.pub 3 days ago
That is exactly right for the Andes variant. Please calm down there panic.