I think it’s implying that
- Draw attention to the point that we depend on plants to breathe.
- A general dystopian portrayal of natural air becoming poisonous and that we will need supplemental O2.
- A point about how even air will be owned and sold to us in the future when billionaires have made natural air unbreathable. More subscriptions to stay alive.
Like most art. The artist allows for multiple interpretations unless they state otherwise.
But usually the point is it’s interpretive. Because the interpretation is personal. Subjective. And becomes more about the viewer than the view.
kahjtheundedicated@lemmy.world 5 days ago
Art vs science, many such cases. Decent band, too