I’ll take it any day over having to see more fucking Met Gala photos rn.
Comment on Nuts or just looking to gain some attention
kahjtheundedicated@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Almost certainly a bit of performance art. Makes for some interesting imagery, and provocative enough to be posted and discussed here. So he’s done well.
a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 weeks ago
Except there is no science behind it, and if anything, it misses the point and implies a person can live off a single house plant.
kahjtheundedicated@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Art vs science, many such cases. Decent band, too
daannii@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
I think it’s implying that
- Draw attention to the point that we depend on plants to breathe.
- A general dystopian portrayal of natural air becoming poisonous and that we will need supplemental O2.
- A point about how even air will be owned and sold to us in the future when billionaires have made natural air unbreathable. More subscriptions to stay alive.
Like most art. The artist allows for multiple interpretations unless they state otherwise.
But usually the point is it’s interpretive. Because the interpretation is personal. Subjective. And becomes more about the viewer than the view.
Kertyna@feddit.nl 3 weeks ago
Ok! I like it. Picasso!
daannii@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Yeah that’s a good point. In the city there are walking around art pieces.
They are intended to be understood as art.