First of all, hyperinflation hasn’t been an issue in any modern economy for decades. We understand more about monetary policy than we did in the 1930s.
Secondly, economic crises did happen prior to Bretton Woods. In fact, they tended to be more common, and more severe.
Finally, it is not obvious at all that “universal currencys (sic) not run by local governments” could do better, especially given our experience with cryptocurrencies, all of which are extremely volatile and not suitable as a currency for that and various other reasons.
booly@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
Doesn’t that happen to most cryptocurrencies?
LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Etherium is in question in the post, so never even close. I’m sure people have lost money, but if you bought at the absolute height and sold at the absolute low after it, you maybe could have lost half once. That’s max loss unless you bought every up and sold on every down. In 5 years you’d be down 16%. 1 year you’d be up 31%. It’s volatile but not as much as people make it out to be.
The government and media have always had reason to put people against it and say it’s only used for drugs. Kind of like those fish men we bombed in boats without trial.
Image
Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
That graph is hilarious. If euros looked like that, nobody would be using them.
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 weeks ago
That’s comparing apples to oranges. What you want to compare to Euros are charts for stable coins. Which, for the legitimate ones that are fully backed, are basically straight lines.
LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
That’s what we have been saying?