I donāt think this is ācar brainedā. Theyāre not saying anything around public transit, just that we need to have a test for DWI and weed. People shouldnāt be jailed for 30 years regardless of the presence of the test or not, but we do still need some other test. Otherwise I guarantee that ādonāt drive while bakedā will be the next infomercial you see in a few years.
Comment on SNSD the GOATš«¶
Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works āØ9ā© āØhoursā© agoImagine being so car brained that you base personal freedom around it
abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world āØ8ā© āØhoursā© ago
Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works āØ7ā© āØhoursā© ago
Missing the point a bit, we shouldnāt base legalization around if people are going to drive their cars on a substance.
HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone āØ1ā© āØhourā© ago
I honestly despise you for calling me ācar brainedā. That insult hurt me more than any other Iāve received. I want to protect pedestrians and cyclists from people driving cars under the influence. I want to limit driving peopleās freedom to make life better for everyone. Fuck you.
Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works āØ1ā© āØhourā© ago
Thatās honestly a very odd reaction, for what itās worth I meant it lightheartedly.
Of course I think pedestrians and cyclists also deserve safety.
I would like to point out however that a majority of incidents are drunk drivers who do not already have a device like that in their car, so itās a tad bit absurd to indicate your hard line for legalization is that when it would only apply after the fact anyway.
HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone āØ56ā© āØminutesā© ago
Sorry, that was too rude, I just got really upset⦠Itās odd, Iāve never really gotten angry at internet comments until now.
I just wanted to point out my single issue with weed, which is more an issue with car centric infrastructure.