Comment on What does DLSS do, and what's up with DLSS 5?

BallShapedMan@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

• MBech@feddit.dk ⁨7⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  It’s more like running an ai instagram filter over the game, than replacement. Still unnecassary though.

  source
• Orygin@sh.itjust.works ⁨7⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  It makes games run worse and look horrible because devs now target dlss performance mode for 60fps on medium hardware. The game is rendered at 720p and blurred to death until you can’t notice the half rendered frame and pixelated effects that depend on it (and TAA).

  It’s also a marketing ploy to lie to consumers, saying their cards get 3x the performance of the previous Gen, by generating fake frames in between real ones. Displaying garbage but because the benchmark say 100+fps, it must be better right? Even though there are more presentation errors, latency is through the roof and the result is insane.

  DLSS 5 continues the trend of lies by simply putting a yassification filter on top, lies to the dev, and lies to the consumers.

  source

  • FauxLiving@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    It makes games run worse and look horrible because devs now target dlss performance mode for 60fps on medium hardware.

    That’s like saying new graphics cards make a game run worse because developers make their games targeted at new hardware.

    You’re conflating two issues. DLSS uses upscaling to improve framerate the the cost of image quality.

    The decision of developers is a completely different issue.

    source
  • thenoirwolfess@fedinsfw.app ⁨6⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    That’s hella weird. 720p only upscales nicely on multiples, so 1440p or 2880p, but last I checked only about 15% of Steam users have QHD monitors. They should’ve gone 960*540 at the very least.

    Of course, they shouldn’t half-ass their quality regardless. Frame gen is fine I guess, but not rendering at full res and using AI to distort the original is a huge issue.

    source

    • Orygin@sh.itjust.works ⁨5⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Frame gen, in my experience, is worse than upscaling. At least upscaling has some uses (but about 10% of what they say in marketing materials). Frame gen just makes the game have worse latency for disgusting frames that barely look like the base game.

      source
  • BallShapedMan@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    I disagree with your premise. It does make games run better which has helped devs get lazy and use it as a crutch. When devs don’t use it as a crutch but let it be a bonus it’s great.

    Though I just replayed Just Cause 3 for kicks and think visually it holds up to just about any of today’s games and runs like a top with any fancy stuff.

    source

    • snooggums@piefed.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      They don’t run better though. DLSS just makes fake frames based in guesses which looks like it is running better.

      It is the same basic premise as LLM slop, it looks like something despite not actually being that thing.

      source

      • BallShapedMan@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        Frame Gen makes fake frames. Standard dlss does no such thing which is what the question was. It uses temporal upscaling. Not the same thing.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
    • Orygin@sh.itjust.works ⁨5⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      I sure hope the games run better when enabled, it’s effectively running at lower resolution and upscaling. It’s just a fancy resolution select marketed as genuine improvements.

      source