Comment on [deleted]

Sanctus@anarchist.nexus ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

• boatswain@infosec.pub ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  Yeah, surely nobody would ever like Batman… /s

  source

  • Solumbran@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    The fact that people like batman is a problem.

    If you think that everyone should do what works without any concern about what is right, that’s your issue.

    source

    • Paragone@piefed.social ⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Diversity exists in all kinds of dimensions, even values.

      That is what the human-category of life is for: exploring interactions between different kinds of human-category-meanings, including values.

      ( souls not interested in catching-in human-category-lives can catch in other kinds of lives, obviously, & most do )

      ---

      Humankind couldn’t outgrow the overly-simplistic 1950’s-America pseudoreality until they EXPERIENCED it.

      The same is true of ALL human-category meanings.

      Some have to experience being a monster, & then reap the karma of what they had “sown”, to use the terms of the root-guru of the Christians, before that-soul/continuum can viscerally understand valuing-others.

      Once the consequences have happened on them enough .. then they’ll understand.

      Without actually-experiencing it, though, how could visceral-learning be?

      All the people who hold that “you don’t need to face what’s in your unconscious: just maintain acceptable-appearances, & be the appearances, & then everything’ll be fine” want inauthentic meaning, inauthentic-realization-of-a-soul’s-meaning.

      IF a soul/continuum has being-a-horrible-monster in its nature, & it wants to explore that, THEN all it has to do is catch-in a world where monsters are currently happening, & then explore that meaning.

      There are countless worlds, in the endless-stream-of-universes..

      some are currently hellworlds, some currently paradises, some in between.

      The majority of the souls who’ve caught in this-world’s human-category-lives want ideological-reacting instead of upright correct-reasoning.

      So?

      IF that’s what humankind wants .. THEN it’s humankind’s right to persue enforcing ideological-reacting, until humankind’s extinguished from this world.

      Then humankind’s “entitlement” will have no “home”, & universe won’t care.

      Then those-souls .. will have to try again, on some other world.

      Endlessly, forever, until they grow-up.

      Endless-stream-of-universes is perfectly efficient & effective, & has NOTHING to do with “religion”.

      It’s just a mechanism in-which souls explore meanings.

      Souls currently caught-in the lives of monsters, on worlds that are having those, included.

      Why would it be “a problem” for others to have other values?

      Ideological-homogeneity may be your idea of heaven, but MOST of the world doesn’t want to be homogeneous with you or me.

      If that’s your idea of “a problem”, then too bad.

      Salut, Namaste, & Kaizen,

      _ /\ _

      source

      • Solumbran@lemmy.world ⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        Or, you know.

        Humans are a bunch of savage monkeys, and it’s up to them to make up rules that enforce what is best for everyone, and morals do that. And if you sacrifice morals to follow an illusion of success, then that’s a problem and I’m going to call you on it.

        I don’t believe in the idea that “if most people want shit then let them have it”.

        Kids want to eat kilos of candies, yet you don’t let them eat it and die. Well it’s the same with humans. If a majority is having shit values or morals, then you need to educate them, not let them be. The idea of letting things be is what led to things like the nazis, where no one wanted to oppose them until half of their country was invaded.

        And understanding things without experiencing is called empathy, and it’s a trainable skill. Which also needs to be enforced upon people. It’s crazy to me that prehistoric humans were having more empathy than current humans, even though we now have thousands of years of philosophy behind us.

        All in all, we need to stop being so complacent about others being shitty, and start enforcing rules and safeguard that force people to be held to a certain moral standard. That’s how we’ll evolve.

        source
  • Sanctus@anarchist.nexus ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Yeah but that comic exists already. OP probably has cool ideas that don’t rewuire every character being wealthy. I would bet the wealth is used to excuse why they can explore this instead of beung an integral part to the character, thats exactly how batman uses it.

    source