That’s not true. I believe in gods and I’m n antirealist. I think everything is subjective and we should kill the idea of one objective reality.
Comment on Unconventional strategy.
surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 1 day agoThe problem with believing in gods is that you think you are right. That makes other people wrong. And so it begins…
Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 12 hours ago
surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 8 hours ago
If you can believe that, then you can believe anything, and you’re one good conversation away from being manipulated and used.
Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 7 hours ago
I sure can believe anything, I can believe whatever I want. I take choice, agency, and responsibility over My worldview. While realists take no agency and no accountability, they take no active part in shaping their perceptual world. I choose My perception based on My moral compass, but realists can be manipulated into believing anything.
surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 7 hours ago
A realists accountability is to reproducibility and observability.
But if you can believe anything, and that makes you happy, then good. I personally believe red is green and drive how I like. Sure I’ve killed a few people, but that’s in reality so I don’t believe it.
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 22 hours ago
Why would you believe anything if you were going to believe you were wrong?
surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 22 hours ago
And that’s why you shouldn’t.
Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 12 hours ago
Yeah, and that’s why realists who believe in an objective reality are stupid. They won’t admit they’re wrong no matter how much evidence is stacked against them.
thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 6 hours ago
I honestly don’t even think I get your position here. Do you somehow not believe that you live in some kind of objective reality together with the rest of us? Do you think this is all just going on in your head? Like… is this some kind of far-out simulation theory thing? Even if we do live in a simulation, that simulation itself must exist in some kind of “real world”.
Please explain
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 21 hours ago
believing you are right is requisite to belief. acknowledgement that you might be wrong, in the existence of doubt, that’s maturity but it does not preclude the belief that you are right.
surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 19 hours ago
I think you’ve just talked yourself into a circle. You can’t both believe something and doubt it. Doubt is the opposite of belief.
What you’re talking about is possibly belief in belief. That’s the belief that you should believe, or belief that you do believe. That is not the same as actual belief.
ptu@sopuli.xyz 23 hours ago
That is one way to see it, but it’s also possible to have a more pluralistic view. Like in India which has a long tradition of many religions co-existing with respect.
DaMummy@hilariouschaos.com 22 hours ago
Boy, you should really look into how they’re handing their Muslim population. Though, yes, much like the Israel situation, the Brits really fucked that region up.
surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 21 hours ago
You can respect someone and still think they’re wrong. Just like I respect you right now.
But if you truly believe in your religion, then you must believe that other religions aren’t right.
ptu@sopuli.xyz 14 hours ago
That’s only your view of it, and if it suits you then so be it
surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 8 hours ago
So Hindu believe that the alien worshipping death cult that thinks all Hindu should die is as true as their own religion? That doesn’t seem right.
harmbugler@piefed.social 18 hours ago
Not necessarily. If I wear rose-tinted glasses while yours are tinted green, I may still believe that the worlds we see are lit by the same light.
surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 17 hours ago
If you believe that, then you believe you do not actually know the truth. But only an interpretation of what might be true.