This cartoon shows the real reason why that is the gold standard.
Comment on Gottem
black_flag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 days ago
In double-blind studies, the test administrators are made unaware which sample is real vs. placebo
blackbrook@mander.xyz 3 days ago
marcos@lemmy.world 3 days ago
There’s probably a mirror somewhere, with a person behind thinking “Please, let those be from the control group and not our students!”
luciole@beehaw.org 3 days ago
We need to go deeper.
ch00f@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Also, the nocebo effect is real.
shneancy@lemmy.world 3 days ago
deeply meaningless rant:
why do we need two words for placebo effect when it’s just positive placebo and negative placebo, i know i know, the word placebo has an ingrained positive aspect in its root… but it’s not like the english language ever gives a fuck about the roots of a word, it bastardises all words equally! why make an exception now?? why not just call it negative placebo!
woofenator@lemmy.world 3 days ago
It’s because Placebo and Nocebo are not meant for english, but for clear medical communication, same reason Latin is used in the medical field, instead of plain English/Spanish/Canadian/etc. Both words are Latin, Placebo is
I shall pleaseand Nocebo isI will harm, and a doctor looking at those two words will, without a shadow of a doubt, know what has occured, if anything, to a patienthector@lemmy.today 3 days ago
Medical is mostly greek not latin.
shneancy@lemmy.world 3 days ago
the whole point is nothing has occured though, or rather nothing medically solvable
wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 3 days ago
It’s not about positive/negative. Those have specific meanings in research, and it’s not “good vs. bad” like in colloquial speech.
Placebo/nocebo are both positives, but the difference is about whether the imagined effect is beneficial or adverse. Imagining a beneficial effect is a positive, and imagining an adverse effect is also a positive.
“Negative” would imply they’re imagining that something isn’t there. For instance, if clinicians could verify that a physiological change took place, but due to the subject’s expectations they don’t notice any change in symptoms. Like, “I thought it was a placebo so I don’t feel any better.” I don’t think there’s a word for that because it’s not typically how trials are designed.
ch00f@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Double plus good idea.
Hupf@feddit.org 3 days ago
Placebo Blocker