The people were guilty except for the innocent ones?
Comment on W for Uncle Ted
BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 9 hours ago
In another post, I mentioned that he may have been correct all along, and the people he targeted had it coming, except for the innocent ones. Ted was a bit sloppy on that regard.
I got savagely downvoted.
Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 hours ago
Donkter@lemmy.world 1 hour ago
I think they mean the targets were guilty but the post office workers and secretaries that got bombed were still innocent.
PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 7 hours ago
“I aced that test! As long you don’t count the answers I got wrong…”
BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 8 hours ago
Yep, pretty much. Seems like unassailable logic to me.
Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 hours ago
Do you have a list of innocents and guilties, preferably with some notes as to why for guilty ones? Or maybe a link to your mentioned comment?
Lioffproxy@lemmy.world 4 hours ago
Weren’t they mostly academics? I mean he was messed with, with multiple right? Wasn’t his targets about that?
BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 8 hours ago
Nah, I’m busy. You know how to use Google.
edm@thelemmy.club 3 hours ago
Not that different from all the innocents the US gov has murdered. We literally just watched ICE gun down two citizens in Minnesota and per usual nothing will happen or change.
paranoia@feddit.dk 7 hours ago
Correct all along, aside from suggesting that we need to essentially genocide each other until all states collapse and the population is a small fraction of what it is today.
aaa999@lemmy.world 3 hours ago
This is typical of far right dipshits though. 1. vaguely identify an actual observable problem that any fuckup can see 2. be wrong about a bunch of stuff 3. murder
ReverendIrreverence@lemmy.world 2 hours ago
Uncle Ted was the polar opposite of a “far right dipshit” though unless I am missing something